Geriatric OE

The weekly musing of a couple of Kiwis on their geriatric OE in The UK






Saturday, 6 April 2013

5951 and counting...

Are you viewer 6000
 
Wow what is that big round yellow thing up there in the sky?
Could it be… could it really be the sun.
Yup that is exactly what it is. And not only that the temperature is not in negative numbers.
Could it be that the big April freeze is over? Let’s hope so.
This morning The Man and I went off to the London Museum to see a gruesome sounding exhibition calle Doctors, Dissections and resurrection Men. I’ve been wanting to see it ever since I saw the adds for it, Well wouldn’t you? Read this…

In 2006, Museum of London archaeologists excavated a burial ground at the Royal London Hospital in Whitechapple. What they found was bot extraordinary and unexpected
The excavation revealed some 262 burials. In the confusing mix of bones was extensive evidence of dissection, autopsy and amputation, bones wired for teaching, and animals dissected for comparative anatomy. Dating from a key period – that of the Anatomy Act of 1832 – the discovery is one of the most significant in the UK, offering fresh insight into early 19th century dissection and the trade in dead bodies.
Now, 180 years later, you can uncover this intriguing story in Doctors, Dissection and Resurrection Men, a major exhibition at the Museum of London. Bringing together human and animal remains, exquisite anatomical models and drawings, documents and original artefacts, the exhibition reveals the intimate relationship between surgeons pushing forward anatomical study and the bodysnatchers who supplied them; and the shadowy practices prompted by a growing demand for corpses.
And it was really interesting, and amazing. Dissection was in its infancy a very controversial subject. But how were surgeons to learn about the secrets of the human body without looking at real specimens. It was a real case of dammed if you do and dammed if you don’t because if they mucked thing up they would be very unpopular, if not actually legally liable.
You may have herd of Burke and Hare, who took body snatching to a hgher level by committing murder to improve their supply of fresh corpses for the dissectionists. In fact it came to be known as Burking.
These men are universally believed to have beenbody-snatcher  but in fact they made a good living in the 1820s supplying an Edinburgh’s anatomy school with dead bodies obtained by murder

William Burke and William Hare never were grave-robbers. They are reputed to have hit upon their calling by accident: an old man died owing rent in Mrs Hare's cheap lodging house, and the men decided to recoup the money by selling the corpse. They were welcomed at Dr Knox's anatomy school, and the £7.10s they were paid amply covered the debt. Burke later confessed that ‘that was the only subject they sold that they did not murder, and getting that high price made them try the murdering of subjects.’ Soon afterwards, when another lodger fell ill, they helped him on his way with whisky, and smothered him. This first successful murder probably took place in December 1827, and Burke and Hare were paid £10 for the body. The deaths of a further fifteen individuals — twelve women, two handicapped youths, and an old man — followed.
The Burke and Hare murders are critically significant to the history of anatomy in Britain. They represent the apotheosis of the market in human flesh. The murders reveal that by the late 1820s, the poor were worth more dead than alive. A further 60 murders (by the ‘London Burkers’ Bishop and Williams, in 1831) occurred before the Anatomy Act of 1832 provided the anatomists with a free supply of corpses requisitioned from Poor Law workhouses.


No comments:

Post a Comment